| May 20, 2015  Senator Ted Cruz:  Last night, my wife,  Carolyn, and I attended your meeting in Beaumont, Texas.  In my  seventy-one years plus, this was the fourth political meeting I have  attended.  The first was a political rally for Senator Hubert Humphrey in  Waco, Texas in 1966.  (See below)  At the conclusion of your meeting,  Carolyn and I contributed to your campaign the maximum allowed by Federal  regulation.   We did not do this because we think you will win the  Republican Presidential nomination or that you will be elected President.   We did not do this because we desire or expect to receive any consideration for  an idea or project we are supporting.  We did not do this because we are  endorsing your candidacy, although I can vote for you. That is not an idle  comment because I have never failed to go to the polls but upon occasion there  was no candidate for president that I could or would vote for.  Dershowitz and Cruz We did give your campaign  the legal limit of financial support because we are endorsing your character,  your ideas and your life-story.  We did it because we  do expect the favor of you personally reading this note.  I will ask your  staff to forward it to you.  I awoke at 2 AM this morning thinking about  your presentation and the future. I agree we are at a pivotal time in the  history of our country.  Finally, at 3:00 AM I dressed and came to my  office to think through this note.  I hope it is helpful to you.  While we do not worship at  the altar of the Assyrian and Babylonian god, Nebo, who was the god of “wisdom  and writing - education,” we do appreciate Alan Dershowitz’ affirmation of your  God-given intellectual gifts.    In a series of reminisces about  former students, Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz said of you:  “U.S.  Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas): ‘Off-the-charts brilliant. And you know, liberals  make the terrible mistake, including some of my friends and colleagues, of  thinking that all conservatives are dumb. And I think one of the reasons that  conservatives have been beating liberals in the courts and in public debates is  because we underestimate them. Never underestimate Ted Cruz. He is  off-the-chart brilliant…’”  http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/20140406_The_Pulse__Dershowitz_and_his_life_at_Harvard_Law.html   It is our prayer and hope that you will continue to use these enormous gifts as  you already have for the good of your fellow man.  The following two quotations  give context to what I wish to say about your campaign.  First, Goethe  said, “Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not  enough; we must do.”  (Johann  Wolfgang von Goethe)  The Institute of Medicine  used this quote in admonishing healthcare providers that  it is not enough simply to know what is right; we must do what is right.  The Moral Test  My admiration  for Senator Hubert Humphrey - I voted for him for President - stems from his  address to the 1948 Democratic National Convention where he courageously  addressed civil rights before it was politically correct.  The response to  his address was that the Dixicrats walked out of the Convention in opposition  to civil and human rights for African Americans.   In 1977, Senator  Humphrey enunciated what has come to be called the “moral test of a government”  and which now adorns the lobby of the Health and Human Services building in  Washington, D.C.  He said, ““The moral test of government is how it treats those who  are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life,  the aged; and those in the shadows of life, the sick, the needy and the  handicapped.”   (Hubert Humphrey Source/Notes:  Remarks at the dedication of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building, November 1, 1977,  Congressional Record, November 4, 1977, vol 123, p. 37287.)  I ascribe to  this test. It  is in the context of the above that I offer the following observations.   And, my observations are offered in the context of what I know best which is  healthcare delivery and policy.  You may not remember but I asked you the  question, “How can we prevent the republican nomination process from resulting  in the election of the democrat nominee.”  The context of this questions  is that if twelve good men and women tear each other apart out of personal  political ambition, it may result in the democrat nominee winning the  election.  The other dilemma you face and one which you know you face is  that in winning the Republican nomination, you may position yourself such that  it is not possible for you to win the general election and the   presidency.  Remember, it is possible to be true to your principles and to  make your tent large enough to include people who don’t agree with everything  you say but they welcome your forthrightness, your character and your  willingness to listen to those who disagree with you without ridiculing them. I  appreciate and admire that you believe that “telling the truth as you see it”  is the way to political success, but I remind you that you are not running to  be the president of republicans but you are running to be the president of the  republic.  Let me explain.  I am not a politician because I cannot  compromise.  That is not said arrogantly as compromise is the “coin of the  realm in a democratic republic” and my inability to compromise disqualifies me  from running for office.  For instance, I have deeply held,  religiously-based beliefs.  I often describe myself as a social liberal, a  fiscal conservative and a theological fundamentalist.  This means that I  think everyone has the right to live as they personally chose and that even if  I have the electoral power, I do not have the right to impose my views upon  others, as they do not have the right to demand that  I affirm things with  which I disagree.  I have the responsibility to support a society in which  each person can chose their own way and that society has the responsibility to  respect my beliefs when peacefully, respectfully and compassionately practiced. Personal  Belief and Public Policy Illustrative  of this is that I believe that homosexuality violates my personal religious  beliefs.  But, I have publicly opposed prejudice and violence against  homosexuals.  Once a friend came to me and told me that he is a  homosexual.  I already knew that and I told my friend, I love you and I  receive you - this word means “to make room in your heart for someone.”  I  affirmed my personal belief about homosexuality.  I told my friend, “My  responsibility is to receive you as you are; your responsibility is to receive  me as I am.   If it comes to a confrontation, I will publicly support  you, but if you or others demand that I affirm or endorse your life-style, I  will not.” At your  event last night, I applauded at all the appropriate points consistent with  everything I have said above.  For anyone that was not there, I add that  you did not address the issue of same-sex marriage or homosexuality.   However, there is one issue you raised at which point I did not applaud, which  was your comments about “Obama Care,” the somewhat derisive manner in which  many refer to the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.” (ACA)  I  did not applaud because, while there are elements of the ACA with which I  disagree, your principle description of the Act was that you do not want the government  to get between the doctor and the patient.   The  Republican Alternative to the ACA To my  knowledge and I have read the entire behemoth, there is nothing in the ACA  which interferes with the patient/provider relationship.  Before you say,  what about “You can keep your doctor, if you want to,” I agree that was a  deception.  However, for at least the last fifty years and in some cases  for over 100 years, patients have accepted the requirement to chose a doctor  who is in their health plan or who is in their clinic.  Consistent with  what I say, once the patient/doctor relationship is established in the context  of this financial arrangement, only the doctor and patient decide on the  care.  If a health-plan contract limits care or excludes a particular  treatment, it does not dictate what care is to be given but only what care the  health plan will pay for.  Furthermore, your comments and those of other  Republican candidates are symptomatic of the recurring deficiency of Republican  politicians:  they are keen to tell you what is wrong and with what they  disagree but there is little discussion of what they are for.  The ACA was  passed in March, 2010 and other than the House of Representatives voting 54  times to overturn the ACA, I have not seen one bill or proposal from the  Republicans to replace the ACA with a comprehensive, workable  alternative.  While opposing “Obama Care” will get great applause from  Republicans, it does nothing to tell us what Republicans would do if they  control the White House and both chambers of the Congress.   Senator  Cruz, I came away from your session appreciating you greatly.  I liked the  idea of the simplification of the tax code, but the dirty, little secret is  that you and I know that it will not happen, not because of the evil democrats  but because there is no grit among Republicans to do it.  We’re not going  to get rid of the Department of Education for the same reason.   I  also came away knowing that you are against the ACA but having no idea what you  are for.  If I were you - and you and America are glad that I am not - I  would never mention Hillary Clinton again.  I would never mention the ACA  again.  I would loudly, clearly, simply declare what my healthcare  transformation will look like.  Re-read Goethe’s and Humphrey’s statements;  see their application.  And, if your first step is to remove the ACA, your  simultaneous, second step should be to vote in your health plan which is  simultaneously presented to the Congress.  Tell us what  you’re for, not in generalizations and particularly not in opposing Democrats,  but what you propose, what you will do and what you have put into the pubic  arena for discussion.  A comedian once said, “Tell me something you  believe in; I’ve got enough doubts of my own.”  Imagine, if rather than  your audience last night having walked away knowing that you’re against the  ACA, they had walked away knowing that you are for:  
Healthcare for children,  the poor and the elderlyHealthcare  transformation which comes from the internalized passions and ideals of  healthcare providers which passions and ideals are guided by evidenced-based  literature rather than healthcare reform which is based on rules, regulations,  and requirements which come from external pressure applied by government  oversight.Healthcare which  promotes quality and safety in care.Electronic patient  management rather than simply electronic patient recordsEtc. If you are  going to attract independents, Reagan Democrats and to energize Republicans, it  will have to be done with content and ideas.  This will not be done with  what you are against but with the substance of what you are for.  I have added  below my signature, links to my thoughts on pubic healthcare policy and  healthcare transformation.  If it should be valuable to your campaign I  would be happy, at my expense, to dialogue with your staff and advisors about a  healthcare policy which could attract the vision and passion of the  nation.  It would never mention the ACA.  James (Larry) Holly, M.D.C.E.O. SETMA
 www.jameslhollymd.com
 Adjunct ProfessorFamily& Community Medicine
 University of Texas Health Science Center
 San Antonio School of Medicine
 Clinical Associate Professor Department of Internal Medicine
 School of Medicine
 Texas A&M Health Science Center
 PS:   For the past 17 years, I have written a weekly newspaper column on health  affairs. All of those articles can be found at www.jameslhollymd.com.  In  addition there are over 250 articles written about SETMA which are posted under  Your Life Your Health.  Below are the links to articles about public  health policy which you may find interesting.  The following link gives  you an introduction to SETMA The following link gives some information about SETMA:  http://jameslhollymd.com/in-the-news/vital-signs-examiner-publication SETMA  is the only practice in America which possess all of the following: SETMA’s  Recognitions and Accreditations 
	| NCQA - PC-MH Tier  III | 2010-2016 |  | NCQA -- Diabetes Recognition | 2010-2016 |  | NCQA -- Heart And Stroke Recognition | 2010-2016 |  | NCQA -- Distinction in Patient Experience Reporting | 2014-2015 |  | AAAHC --  PC-MH | 2010-2017 |  | AAAHC -- Ambulatory Care | 2010-2017 |  | URAC -- PC-MH  Advance Certification with EMR | 2014-2017 |  | The Joint Commission --  PC-MH | 2014-2017 |  | The Joint Commission -- Ambulatory  Care | 2014-2017 |  | The Joint Commission -- Clinical Laboratory Services | 2014-2016 |  | Texas Medical Foundation, CMS’ Texas QIO -- The Texas Practice Quality Improvement  Award | 2012-2014 |  Public  Policy and Healthcare Transformation links: Your Life Your Health - Healthcare  Reform: Public Policy Abraham Lincoln  and Modern Healthcare - 02/15/2013An Analysis and  Response to President Obama's Health Care Reform Address to the American  Medical Association: Part I - 06/18/2009
 An Analysis and  Response to President Obama's Health Care Reform Address to the American  Medical Association: Part II - 06/25/2009
 An Analysis and  Response to President Obama's Health Care Reform Address to the American  Medical Association: Part III - 07/02/2009
 An Analysis and  Response to President Obama's Health Care Reform Address to the American  Medical Association: Part IV - My Healthcare Reform - 07/09/2009
 Can More Care  Provide Less Health? - 05/14/2009
 County Health  Rankings - Part I - Jefferson County’s Results and what it means - 02/26/2010
 County Health  Rankings - Part II - Quality of Care - What Will Be Gained by Public Reporting - 03/04/2010
 Entrepreneurism  versus Professionalism Part II: Republicans and Democrats Both Have it Wrong - 04/22/2010
 Entrepreneurship  vs Professionalism Part I: Drivers of Healthcare Cost - 04/15/2010
 Framing the  Discussion of How to Solve the Nation's Health Care Problems - 11/29/2007
 Health Care  Reform: What is in the bill? - 04/01/2010
 Healthcare  Change - Foundational Ideas - 11/12/2009
 Healthcare  Change and the Uninsured - Part I: Hope, Value, Virtue - 08/16/2012
 Healthcare  Policy and Hope - 06/21/2007
 Healthcare  Policy and Hope Part II - 06/28/2007
 Healthcare  Policy Issues Part II - Reality, Responsibility and Rights - 08/13/2009
 Healthcare  Policy Issues Part III - Reforming or Transforming Healthcare - 08/20/2009
 Healthcare  Policy Myths - 03/19/2010
 Healthcare Reform:  What Must Be Involved? - 02/04/2010
 Healthcare  Reform: What Must Be Involved? Part II -- Honesty - 02/11/2010
 Healthcare  Reform: What Must Be Involved? Part III - Hard Choices; Personal Choice - 02/18/2010
 Pursuing  Excellence in Healthcare Delivery:Personal Mastery and Electronic Medical  Records as Tools of Excellence - 01/08/2009
 Quality of Care  and Healthcare Reform - 06/10/2010
 Rationing Health  Care vs. Rational Healthcare - 08/06/2009
 Response to Week  at Harvard Kennedy School of Government: Shaping Healthcare Delivery Policy - 02/09/2013
 The Implications  of the Presidential Election for Healthcare Policy - 11/15/2012
 Your Healthcare  Found in Your Caring for Others - 09/11/2008
 Your Life Your  Health - Medical Records A Health IT  Academy at Texas A&M - 07/03/2014A New Day in  Healthcare for You and for Us - Part V - Certified Electronic Health Records  (EHRs) - 08/26/2010
 A New Day in  Healthcare for You and For Us - Part VI - Meaningful Use - 09/23/2010
 A Review of 2010  and a Projection for 2011 - 12/30/2010
 A Texas A&M  Health IT Academy Part 2 of 5 - 07/10/2014
 Abraham Lincoln  and Modern Healthcare - 02/15/2013
 Address to the  Beaumont Chamber of Commerce August 2000 Part I - 01/06/2011
 Address to the  Beaumont Chamber of Commerce August 2000 Part II - 01/13/2011
 Case Study:  Laboratory Information Systems on ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory - 10/01/2011
 Designing an EMR  Guided by The Fifth Discipline by Peter Senge, PhD - 01/27/2007
 Don't Load Both  Barrels - The Story of SETMA's Implementation of NextGen EMR and EPM - 12/08/2005
 Electronic  Health Records (EHR) and Quality Improvement: If You Make a Change will it Make  a Difference? - 02/03/2011
 Healthcare and  Numbers: Making the Switch to ICD-10 - 09/25/2014
 Healthcare  Quality Award 2012 Part I - Priorities for Performance Improvement - 12/01/2011
 Healthcare  Quality Award 2012 Part II - Dashboard to Measure and Manage Whole System  Performance - 12/08/2011
 Healthcare  Quality Award 2012 Part IV - Data-Driven Improvement in the National Quality  Strategy Priority Goal Areas - 12/23/2011
 Healthcare:  Metanoia -- A Shift of Mind - 02/06/2003
 Healthcare: EMR  only distantly related to 'real' electronic patient management - 02/20/2003
 Healthcare:  Improving Health -- Overcoming Organizational Learning Disabilities - 02/13/2003
 Is Your SETMA  Medical Record Secure?: Part I - 09/27/2012
 Is Your SETMA  Medical Record Secure?: Part II - 10/04/2012
 Managed Care and  Electronic Patient Records - 05/11/2000
 March 30, 1998 -  March 30, 2012: SETMA's Journey Toward Electronic Health Records - 03/29/2012
 Medical Records:  Beyond Electronic Medical Records - 06/01/2003
 Medical Records:  Evolving into Electronic Patient Management - 06/13/2003
 Medical Records:  Is it Secure? - 01/24/2001
 Medical Records:  What Should it Contain? - 01/18/2001
 More Than a  Transcription Service: Revolutionizing the Practice of Medicine: And Meeting  the Challenge of Managed Care With Electronic Medical Records (EMR) which  Evolves into Electronic Patient Management - 05/01/1999
 Patient-Centered  Medical Home and Care Transitions: Part I - 04/21/2011
 Patient-Centered  Medical Home: The Power of Data in Designing the future of healthcare - 05/20/2010
 Pilgrimage to a  Patient-Centered Medical Home - 02/17/2011
 Principles of  Change Agents: If you are going to make a change, it had better make a  difference - 08/09/2012
 Pursuing  Excellence in Healthcare Delivery:Personal Mastery and Electronic Medical  Records as Tools of Excellence - 01/08/2009
 SETMA -- HIMSS  Stories of Success:Part I -- Improving Population Healthcare and Safety Through  Real-time Data access, Auditing and Reporting - 02/24/2011
 SETMA and  Meaningful Use: Outline of SETMA's Deployment Part II - 08/21/2014
 SETMA HIMSS  Stories of Success: Part II -- Improving Population Healthcare and Safety  Through Real-time Data access, Auditing and Reporting - 03/04/2011
 SETMA’s Response  to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: Part III The Primary Care Team Learning  from Effective Ambulatory Practices - 06/14/2012
 Texas A&M  Health IT Academy Part 3 of 5 - 07/17/2014
 Texas A&M  Health IT Academy Part 4 of 5 - 07/24/2014
 Texas A&M  Health IT Academy Part 5 of 5 - 07/31/2014
 The Place of  Patient-Centered Medical Home in the Future of Healthcare Delivery - 07/23/2009
 The Titanic:  Technology, Temerity and Tradition - What Healthcare Can Learn From the Titanic
 James (Larry) Holly, M.D. C.E.O. SETMA
 www.jameslhollymd.com
 
 Adjunct Professor
 Family & Community Medicine
 University of Texas Health Science Center
 San Antonio School of Medicine
 Clinical Associate Professor Department of Internal Medicine
 School of Medicine
 Texas A&M Health Science Center
 |